Meaningful Use? Whoa! Good God y’all! What is it good for? Very, very little. Sing it again…
OK, maybe it’s the greatest idea in the history of health IT, or maybe it’s a good idea gone terribly, terribly wrong (my theory), but it it’s not going to move hospitals along any faster than they are already toward smart, sophisticated IT use that saves lives. There are efforts out there that do stand a chance of improving IT use (take your pick from dozens, which I’ll get to in another post), but has anyone provided clinical, social science or other data suggesting that going to MU first was the best way to spend all of this time and money?
After my months-long absence from the blog that I love (<grin>) I’m freshly charged up with looks to me like another major distraction from improving quality.
Here’s my logic: check me out here and see if you agree. The harder the government comes down on hospitals, the more dust will get swept under the rug. And when that “dust” is inefficient processes that stand a chance of killing people,we’re not talking any kind of joke here.
Want an idea of why I’m so skeptical? Here’s a few (why not a couple of bonuses):
* Just got off the phone this week with a children’s hospital CEO, who’s found that 20 percent or less of his colleagues are ready for meaningful use. And check out an Information Week article below, which reports that just 40 percent of hospitals meet 5 MU criteria. Wow.
* Why has it suddenly become a priority, in recent years, to automate processes at the bedside before the processes themselves have been perfected? When Your Editor attended a conference this week on healthcare IT topics, the bedside came up a lot, but not much talk on whether we’ll be running into a GIGO problem.
* Medical groups and hospitals are under great pressure to form Accountable Care Organizations, a new entity for which there are some precedents (decades of capitation) but no clear-cut model. With doctors and hospitals struggling to create the most basic levels of partnerships, is now a good time to pressure them to form their work habits around their IT investments? Yeah, yeah, they’re suppposed to fund and find EMRs and HIEs that meet their needs but really, how often will that happen?
If you’re a big MU fan, well, I’m sorry if I offended you. But I’d much rather you flame the heck out of me here so we can have a nice dialogue on the subject. This is important stuff, people.